Here, Paul VI turns his attention to various groups of people beginning in paragraph 23 with “rulers of nations”:
Appeal to Public Authorities
23. And now We wish to speak to rulers of nations. To you most of all is committed the responsibility of safeguarding the common good. You can contribute so much to the preservation of morals. We beg of you, never allow the morals of your peoples to be undermined. The family is the primary unit in the state; do not tolerate any legislation which would introduce into the family those practices which are opposed to the natural law of God. For there are other ways by which a government can and should solve the population problem—that is to say by enacting laws which will assist families and by educating the people wisely so that the moral law and the freedom of the citizens are both safeguarded.
Seeking True Solutions
We are fully aware of the difficulties confronting the public authorities in this matter, especially in the developing countries. In fact, We had in mind the justifiable anxieties which weigh upon them when We published Our encyclical letter Populorum Progressio. But now We join Our voice to that of Our predecessor John XXIII of venerable memory, and We make Our own his words: “No statement of the problem and no solution to it is acceptable which does violence to man’s essential dignity; those who propose such solutions base them on an utterly materialistic conception of man himself and his life. The only possible solution to this question is one which envisages the social and economic progress both of individuals and of the whole of human society, and which respects and promotes true human values” (See Mater et Magistra). No one can, without being grossly unfair, make divine Providence responsible for what clearly seems to be the result of misguided governmental policies, of an insufficient sense of social justice, of a selfish accumulation of material goods, and finally of a culpable failure to undertake those initiatives and responsibilities which would raise the standard of living of peoples and their children (Populorum progressio, nos. 48-55). If only all governments which were able would do what some are already doing so nobly, and bestir themselves to renew their efforts and their undertakings! There must be no relaxation in the programs of mutual aid between all the branches of the great human family. Here We believe an almost limitless field lies open for the activities of the great international institutions.
In addressing these various groups, Paul VI always brings us back to the universal call to holiness, that each person has the obligation to fulfill God’s will and Law by protecting the dignity of each human person. Once again, the Church recognizes that there are challenges, but nevertheless, the well-being of each person and of society at large depends on the adherence to God’s Law.
With respect to government, it has “the responsibility of safeguarding the common good”. The policies and laws of government need to be set up in such a way that families (the primary unit in the state) can freely follow God’s plan for marriage and family. In this way, families can thrive, and when families thrive, society thrives.
Posted by 1catholicsalmon on May 5, 2012
Observing the Natural Law
11. The sexual activity, in which husband and wife are intimately and chastely united with one another, through which human life is transmitted, is, as the recent Council recalled, “noble and worthy” (cf. Gaudium et Spes, n. 49). It does not, moreover, cease to be legitimate even when, for reasons independent of their will, it is foreseen to be infertile. For its natural adaptation to the expression and strengthening of the union of husband and wife is not thereby suppressed. The fact is, as experience shows, that new life is not the result of each and every act of sexual intercourse. God has wisely ordered laws of nature and the incidence of fertility in such a way that successive births are already naturally spaced through the inherent operation of these laws. The Church, nevertheless, in urging men to the observance of the precepts of the natural law, which it interprets by its constant doctrine, teaches that each and every marital act must of necessity retain its intrinsic relationship to the procreation of human life (cf. Pius XI, Casti connubi).
Natural Law, remember, is that which we naturally know as right vs. wrong because God placed that knowledge within us along with a conscience which tells us to do good and avoid evil. Sex is a gift given by God to a husband and wife for the twin purposes of strengthening the bond between them (as they are no longer two but one flesh) and bringing children into the world. Even if a couple is unable to have children, the conjugal act is still “noble and worthy” assuming that they are at least open to having children.
That last line is of great importance: “each and every marital act must of necessity retain its intrinsic relationship to the procreation of human life.” Contraception willingly severs that intrinsic relationship between the marital act and the procreation of life. And that is why the use of artificial contraception is always by its very nature a mortal sin. Mortal sins cut us off from God’s grace which gives life to our souls (whereas venial sins wound that connection). The use of contraception is a mortal sin because it destroys God’s plan for man and woman to “be fruitful and multiply”.
See references in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
nn. 1854-1864 on “The Gravity Of Sin: Mortal And Venial Sin”
n. 2370 and 2399 on Contraception which the Catechism (citing Humanae Vitae n. 14) describes as “intrinsically evil”.
(Posted with permission from Fr. Lee Acervo at http://fatheracervo.wordpress.com)
Posted by 1catholicsalmon on April 13, 2012
This kind of question requires from the teaching authority of the Church a new and deeper reflection on the principles of the moral teaching on marriage—a teaching which is based on the natural law as illuminated and enriched by divine Revelation.
No member of the faithful could possibly deny that the Church is competent in her magisterium to interpret the natural moral law. It is in fact indisputable, as Our predecessors have many times declared, (Popes Pius IX, Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII, and John XXIII) that Jesus Christ, when He communicated His divine power to Peter and the other Apostles and sent them to teach all nations His commandments (cf. Mt 28:18-19), constituted them as the authentic guardians and interpreters of the whole moral law, not only, that is, of the law of the Gospel but also of the natural law. For the natural law, too, declares the will of God, and its faithful observance is necessary for men’s eternal salvation (cf. Mt 7:21).
In carrying out this mandate, the Church has always issued appropriate documents on the nature of marriage, the correct use of conjugal rights, and the duties of spouses. These documents have been more copious in recent times.
First, let’s define some necessary terms:
- Natural Law: the basic principles of right and wrong that exists in every human person by nature. God created us with these principles in our hearts, and so every human person is capable of knowing these principles. Pope Leo XIII said, “The natural law is engraved in the soul of every man, because human reason tells him to do good and avoid evil. It has force because it is the voice of a higher reason to which our spirit must submit.”
- Moral law: The law given to us by God that says “to do what is good and avoid what is evil” (cf. Gaudium et Spes, n. 16). It is our conscience that urges us to follow this law for it will lead us to Heaven.
Some points to notice:
- The “moral teaching on marriage” is based on natural law. God teaches us through divine Revelation in the words of Scripture and the teachings of His Church, but the basic principles are known to man naturally. This includes things such as marriage being between one man and one woman and procreation as the fruit of marriage. These are common sense things.
- The Church is competent to speak on matters of marriage and family because Jesus Christ Himself gave the Church His authority to teach. And because the moral law relates to our salvation, the Church is “the authentic guardians and interpreters of the whole moral law”.
Here we get to one of the problems of the day. There are many, even among Catholics, who don’t see the Church as the authority when it comes to the moral law but only see that Church as one voice among many. Not to mention that there is also an anti-authoritarian mindset that resides in the modern culture. We’ve been taught to question and even distrust authority. People want to trust Jesus but not necessarily the Church that He founded even though it was Jesus who gave the Church His authority.
And so one thing that we have to do help others to see the Church’s role in salvation. What sets the Church apart from “other voices” is that the Church alone has been given her authority by Jesus Christ. The Church didn’t take it upon herself to teach and interpret moral law. She was ordained and sent out by God to do so.
So why can the Church answer the questions that the world poses regarding the transmission of life? Why can the Church declare and teach what is morally good and morally evil? Because Jesus founded the Church to do just that.
(Posted with permission from Fr. Lee Acervo at http://fatheracervo.wordpress.com)
Posted by 1catholicsalmon on March 29, 2012
Picture from Father Piotr W. Wiśniowski (cyber-missionary)
In terms of Catholicism my mind ejected words that read: Natural Law!???, Consumerism, Secular Mothering, Exemplary, Gifts from God? Worth less than …
Posted by 1catholicsalmon on January 25, 2012